Current:Home > reviewsRussia threatens to fine Wikipedia if it doesn't remove some details about the war -Ascend Wealth Education
Russia threatens to fine Wikipedia if it doesn't remove some details about the war
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:24:15
The Russian government is threatening to fine Wikipedia if it doesn't remove content that contradicts its narrative about the war in Ukraine.
Communications regulator Roskomnadzor announced on Thursday that it had asked the online encyclopedia to remove a page containing "unreliable socially significant materials, as well as other prohibited information" about its operations in Ukraine, according to an English translation. It accused the site of intentionally misinforming Russian users.
It said it could fine Wikipedia up to 4 million rubles, or nearly $47,000, for failing to remove those materials, which are illegal under Russian law.
Russia enacted legislation last month that criminalizes war reporting that doesn't echo the Kremlin's version of events — including by calling it a war. The law has forced most of Russia's remaining independent news outlets to close and many journalists to leave the country for fear of facing up to 15 years in prison.
The Wikipedia page in question describes the history and context of the war, as well as specific military operations, casualties and humanitarian impact, human rights violations, legal proceedings, international reaction, economic consequences and media depictions.
It is not clear what specific details the regulator is looking to have removed, but Newsweek reports that it said on Monday that the Russian-language version of the page contained "inaccurate information about the special military operation to protect the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics for the de-militarization and de-Nazification of Ukraine," including the use of the words war, aggression and invasion.
Roskomnadzor's announcement follows two separate warnings to the Wikimedia Foundation, which owns and operates the encyclopedia.
A spokesperson for the foundation told NPR over email that it had received demands on March 1 and again on March 29 to remove information from the Russian-language version of the page about the invasion, before learning of the possible fine.
"The Wikimedia Foundation supports everyone's fundamental right to access free, open, and verifiable information; this escalation does not change our commitment," the spokesperson said.
The information on Wikipedia is sourced and shared by volunteers, with the foundation saying last month that Ukrainian volunteers were continuing to make additions and edits to the encyclopedia even as the war on their country unfolded.
The spokesperson reiterated on Friday that the information within the article continues to be verified, fact-checked and "improved by an ever growing number of Wikipedia volunteer editors," who determine the site's content and editorial standards.
"The Wikimedia Foundation protects and will continue to protect their ability to engage in research and contribute to Wikipedia," the spokesperson added.
In a statement released after the first takedown request last month, the Wikimedia Foundation said the demand "threatened censorship," and that denying people access to reliable information at a time of crisis could have "life-altering consequences." As of March 3, they said the English-language version of the page had been viewed more than 11 million times, and articles about the war had been created in more than 99 languages.
"Wikipedia is an important source of reliable, factual information in this crisis," the foundation wrote. "In recognition of this important role, we will not back down in the face of efforts to censor and intimidate members of our movement. We stand by our mission to deliver free knowledge to the world."
Wikipedia isn't the only information platform facing such a request from Roskomnadzor. Just days ago, the agency warned it would fine Google up to 8 million rubles (more than $93,000) for not following its orders to remove YouTube videos to which it objected.
This story originally appeared on the Morning Edition live blog.
veryGood! (26474)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Who bears the burden, and how much, when religious employees refuse Sabbath work?
- Netflix will end its DVD-by-mail service
- From Spring to Fall, New York Harbor Is a Feeding Ground for Bottlenose Dolphins, a New Study Reveals
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Elizabeth Holmes' prison sentence has been delayed
- The U.K. blocks Microsoft's $69 billion deal to buy game giant Activision Blizzard
- Plans To Dig the Biggest Lithium Mine in the US Face Mounting Opposition
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Taylor Swift Goes Back to December With Speak Now Song in Summer I Turned Pretty Trailer
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- A Black Woman Fought for Her Community, and Her Life, Amidst Polluting Landfills and Vast ‘Borrow Pits’ Mined for Sand and Clay
- DeSantis seeks to control Disney with state oversight powers
- Former WWE Star Darren Drozdov Dead at 54
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Hailey Bieber Slams Awful Narrative Pitting Her and Selena Gomez Against Each Other
- New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Would Protect Activists and Whistleblowers From Abusive Lawsuits
- In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Unintended Consequences of ‘Fortress Conservation’
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Prince George Enjoys Pizza at Cricket Match With Dad Prince William
He 'Proved Mike Wrong.' Now he's claiming his $5 million
Nuclear Fusion: Why the Race to Harness the Power of the Sun Just Sped Up
New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
Former WWE Star Darren Drozdov Dead at 54
Global Warming Drove a Deadly Burst of Indian Ocean Tropical Storms
Supreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law