Current:Home > FinanceTokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages -Ascend Wealth Education
Tokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:45:15
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Tuesday held only the operator of the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant responsible for paying damages to dozens of evacuees.
The Tokyo High Court also slashed the amount to half of what the lower court had ordered and relieved the government of responsibility — a decision that plaintiffs and their lawyers criticized as belittling their suffering and the severity of the disaster.
The court ordered only the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, known as TEPCO, to pay a total of 23.5 million yen ($165,000) to 44 of the 47 plaintiffs, while not holding the government accountable.
Tuesday’s ruling apparently backpedaled from an earlier decision in March 2018, when the Tokyo District Court held both the government and TEPCO accountable for the disaster, which the ruling said could have been prevented if they both took better precautionary measures, ordering both to pay 59 million yen ($414,400) in damages.
The decision comes at a time when Japan’s government tries to accelerate reactor restarts to maximize nuclear energy to meet decarbonization targets, while seeking to tone down the impact of the nuclear disaster 13 years ago, and its memory gradually fades.
Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant melted after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, releasing massive amounts of radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point. About 27,000 of them are still unable to return home.
The government has pushed for the decontamination of affected areas and the reopening of no-go zones, and has urged evacuees to return to their homes while cutting back support for them. The government-set compensation program, which is mostly based on distance from the plant and radiation levels, has triggered divisions and discrimination among communities.
The dispute centers on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a massive tsunami, and whether the disaster could have been averted if the government had ordered the utility to take precautions.
In the ruling, judge Hiro Misumi said the flooding of the plant because of the tsunami wasn’t preventable even if the industry ministry used its authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami estimate at that time.
The decision is among the four rulings that apparently came in line with the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that said the government wasn’t liable for the disaster and that the disaster from a tsunami that high wasn’t foreseeable or preventable.
Motomitsu Nakagawa, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that Tuesday’s high court ruling was “almost a mere copy and paste” of the top court decision and that it “makes me infuriated.”
Nakagawa said the ruling takes the disaster-hit residents’ suffering lightly, and the reduction of the amount of compensation is also tantamount to saying that the operator can get away with paying only that much damage in a disaster.
He said that he planned to discuss a possible appeal to the Supreme Court after consulting with his clients.
Yuya Kamoshita, who has evacuated to Tokyo from Iwaki, south of the Fukushima Daiichi plant with his family, said the ruling was unacceptable because it trivialized the evacuees’ sufferings, and failed to hold the government accountable even though the nuclear power plant was operated as part of the national energy policy.
veryGood! (93383)
Related
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend viewing and gaming
- Biden administration announces largest passenger rail investment since Amtrak creation
- Why do doctors still use pagers?
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Wisconsin university system reaches deal with Republicans that would scale back diversity positions
- Use these tech tips to preserve memories (old and new) this holiday season
- Philanthropist MacKenzie Scott reveals the groups that got some of her $2.1 billion in gifts in 2023
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Indiana secretary of state appeals ruling for US Senate candidate seeking GOP nod
Ranking
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- What’s streaming now: Nicki Minaj’s birthday album, Julia Roberts is in trouble and Monk returns
- FDA approves gene-editing treatment for sickle cell disease
- Everyone knows Booker T adlibs for WWE's Trick Williams. But he also helped NXT star grow
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Utah attorney general drops reelection bid amid scrutiny about his ties to a sexual assault suspect
- What’s streaming now: Nicki Minaj’s birthday album, Julia Roberts is in trouble and Monk returns
- Mexico raids and closes 31 pharmacies in Ensenada that were selling fentanyl-laced pills
Recommendation
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
How sex (and sweets) helped bring Emma Stone's curious 'Poor Things' character to life
A ‘soft landing’ or a recession? How each one might affect America’s households and businesses
Read the full Hunter Biden indictment for details on the latest charges against him
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Federal judge poised to prohibit separating migrant families at US border for 8 years
Hanukkah symbols, songs suddenly political for some as war continues
West Virginia appeals court reverses $7M jury award in Ford lawsuit involving woman’s crash death